Total Conservation Programs in Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,548
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Montana totaled $24,812,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jared Kountz | Brockway, MT 59214 | $44,532 |
62 | Melissa Kountz | Brockway, MT 59214 | $44,532 |
63 | Michelle K Crandell | Scobey, MT 59263 | $44,459 |
64 | N Hanging 5 Ranch | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $44,206 |
65 | Grossman Farms Partnership | Black Eagle, MT 59414 | $43,756 |
66 | Gunsmoke Ranch LLC | Livingston, MT 59047 | $43,753 |
67 | Gary Kiefer Farms Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $43,651 |
68 | Rocky Mountain Bank ** | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $43,630 |
69 | Montgomery Ranch Co | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $43,461 |
70 | Cash Coulee Ltd | Augusta, MT 59410 | $43,367 |
71 | Diana Carney | Scobey, MT 59263 | $42,868 |
72 | Steve Carney | Scobey, MT 59263 | $42,868 |
73 | Russell G Ponessa | Custer, MT 59024 | $42,853 |
74 | Triangle Land & Livestock Co Inc | Browning, MT 59417 | $42,640 |
75 | O-n Ranch | Roy, MT 59471 | $42,466 |
76 | Jennie I Dyrdahl Testamentary Trust | Mesa, AZ 85212 | $42,012 |
77 | Georgie Parenteau | Froid, MT 59226 | $41,931 |
78 | Doris H. Mogan Administrative Trust, Dated March 1 | Oro Valley, AZ 85737 | $41,787 |
79 | William P Briggs Jr | Conrad, MT 59425 | $41,763 |
80 | Cronk Ranch Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $41,590 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”