Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 3,357
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Montana totaled $37,873,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Penny Snider | Harlem, MT 59526 | $63,444 |
82 | Keystone Ranches Inc | Ismay, MT 59336 | $62,776 |
83 | Lazy K6 Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $62,312 |
84 | Lester Gale Phillippi | Hammond, MT 59332 | $61,554 |
85 | Lloyd Zumbrun Jr | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $61,088 |
86 | Stensland Land & Livestock Compan | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $60,650 |
87 | The Bank Of Baker ** | Baker, MT 59313 | $59,900 |
88 | William D Burgan Jr | Roberts, MT 59070 | $59,170 |
89 | James Hamilton Jr | Decker, MT 59025 | $58,556 |
90 | Rafter Ranch | Wise River, MT 59762 | $58,233 |
91 | John W Rogenes | Larslan, MT 59244 | $57,537 |
92 | Independence Bank ** | Havre, MT 59501 | $57,180 |
93 | Sampson G Bird III | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $56,583 |
94 | Cassidy Jesperson | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $56,467 |
95 | Randall Threeirons | Crow Agency, MT 59022 | $56,077 |
96 | Lacy Williams | Broadus, MT 59317 | $55,870 |
97 | Tim R Cowan | Turner, MT 59542 | $55,440 |
98 | Daniel M Mydland | Joliet, MT 59041 | $54,207 |
99 | Todd Michael Panasuk | Bainville, MT 59212 | $53,953 |
100 | Diamond Box Livestock Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $53,922 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”