Farm Subsidy information
Montana
Total Subsidies in Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 18,379
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Montana totaled $580,677,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Rock Creek Farm Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $293,058 |
82 | Carlson Farms Inc | Plentywood, MT 59254 | $292,974 |
83 | Albus Brothers Partnership | Hinsdale, MT 59241 | $292,686 |
84 | Teron Farms Inc | Raymond, MT 59256 | $290,859 |
85 | Richard Dean Smith | Brockton, MT 59213 | $288,848 |
86 | Hartland Colony Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $288,121 |
87 | Big Rose Colony Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $288,080 |
88 | Mountain View Colony Inc | Broadview, MT 59015 | $287,433 |
89 | Hillside Colony Inc | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $284,532 |
90 | Riverview Colony Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $283,231 |
91 | Cross W Livestock LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $281,021 |
92 | Leck Joint Venture | Galata, MT 59444 | $278,920 |
93 | Sauer Farms LLC | Nashua, MT 59248 | $278,893 |
94 | Tyler G Stephens | Augusta, MT 59410 | $278,215 |
95 | Huber Farms Inc | Vida, MT 59274 | $278,041 |
96 | Hanrahan Farms Inc | Scobey, MT 59263 | $277,777 |
97 | Kevin Rasmussen | Scobey, MT 59263 | $277,657 |
98 | Solberg Livestock | Westby, MT 59275 | $277,454 |
99 | Darryl James Crowley | Poplar, MT 59255 | $276,716 |
100 | Jeffrey D Wivholm | Medicine Lake, MT 59247 | $275,552 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”