Total Disaster Programs in Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 10,181
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Montana totaled $562,674,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Via Terra Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $410,391 |
82 | Cutting Edge Farms LLC | Joplin, MT 59531 | $409,930 |
83 | Sunny Brook Colony Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $408,983 |
84 | Eagle Creek Colony Inc | Galata, MT 59444 | $408,885 |
85 | Tyler M Murnion | Jordan, MT 59337 | $407,680 |
86 | East End Colony Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $401,693 |
87 | Wesley Steppler | Culbertson, MT 59218 | $401,511 |
88 | Becker Farming | Billings, MT 59101 | $399,988 |
89 | Floyd Frey | Harlem, MT 59526 | $396,289 |
90 | Keaster Land & Livestock Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $392,206 |
91 | Fords Creek Colony | Grass Range, MT 59032 | $391,671 |
92 | Jean Anderson Dba Robert And Jean Anderson Ranch | Raynesford, MT 59469 | $389,008 |
93 | Rieger Cattle Co | Ismay, MT 59336 | $388,088 |
94 | 3x Farms | Chinook, MT 59523 | $386,358 |
95 | Tara Oakland | Glendive, MT 59330 | $383,438 |
96 | Cavin Steiger | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $382,901 |
97 | F Anderson Ranch Inc | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $380,178 |
98 | David Davenport | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $379,571 |
99 | Gordon Cattle Company | Chinook, MT 59523 | $379,172 |
100 | Peggy Fredericks | Busby, MT 59016 | $376,782 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”