Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,470
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Montana totaled $9,160,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Patricia Compton | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $16,044 |
102 | Morlee Vander Voort | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $16,021 |
103 | Jeris V Denning | Sun River, MT 59483 | $15,858 |
104 | Sage Hen Grazing Association | Sand Springs, MT 59077 | $15,787 |
105 | Floyd C Gabel | Kinsey, MT 59338 | $15,783 |
106 | John H Warner | Sun River, MT 59483 | $15,756 |
107 | Dale Arnst | Valier, MT 59486 | $15,750 |
108 | Randy Russ | Superior, MT 59872 | $15,675 |
109 | Richard Leroy Ewing | Power, MT 59468 | $15,513 |
110 | Beauvais Livestock | Dillon, MT 59725 | $15,504 |
111 | Mcdonald Ranch Inc | Hot Springs, MT 59845 | $15,441 |
112 | Smith 6 Bar S Livestock | Glen, MT 59732 | $15,270 |
113 | Mark Grubb Ranch Inc | Conrad, MT 59425 | $15,229 |
114 | D H Farms Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $14,964 |
115 | New Rockport Colony Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $14,598 |
116 | Jim L Anderson | Chinook, MT 59523 | $14,540 |
117 | Jack Leibee Family Revocable Trus | Whitewood, SD 57793 | $14,537 |
118 | Dave Madison | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $14,491 |
119 | Walter Sprandel Estate | Miles City, MT 59301 | $14,414 |
120 | Donald W Bartholomew | Miles City, MT 59301 | $14,322 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”