Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program in Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 336
Recipients of Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program from farms in Montana totaled $1,344,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Bahn Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $2,970 |
102 | Ricky Ray Winkowitsch | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $2,903 |
103 | Curtis Hershberger | Denton, MT 59430 | $2,856 |
104 | Gray's Northview Farms Inc | Highwood, MT 59450 | $2,818 |
105 | Brenteson Ranch Inc | Conrad, MT 59425 | $2,769 |
106 | Dugas Farms Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $2,733 |
107 | Agra Reid Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $2,729 |
108 | Dennis Rahn | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $2,711 |
109 | D & F Farms Inc | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $2,692 |
110 | Denise L Conover | Broadview, MT 59015 | $2,680 |
111 | Dnrc Trust Land Management - Exem | Helena, MT 59620 | $2,632 |
112 | Irene A Rahn | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $2,605 |
113 | Dahlman Bros | Power, MT 59468 | $2,560 |
114 | Missouri Breaks Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $2,523 |
115 | Eaton & Sons | Lindsay, MT 59339 | $2,519 |
116 | Bud G Knutson | Kingman, AZ 86401 | $2,475 |
117 | Broesder Ranch Inc | Conrad, MT 59425 | $2,440 |
118 | Dale Flikkema | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $2,408 |
119 | Spurgeon Family Ltd Partnership | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $2,395 |
120 | Engellant Ranch Partnership | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $2,319 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”