Total Disaster Programs in Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 10,181
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Montana totaled $562,674,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Unrau Farms Inc | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $376,498 |
102 | Northern Acres LLC | Scobey, MT 59263 | $376,407 |
103 | Turner Hutterian Brethren Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $374,415 |
104 | Rondel Beery | Richey, MT 59259 | $373,960 |
105 | Dawson M Olfert | Frazer, MT 59225 | $373,915 |
106 | R Math Farms Inc | Whitewater, MT 59544 | $373,183 |
107 | Montgomery Ranch Co | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $373,058 |
108 | Singleton Farms | Miles City, MT 59301 | $370,961 |
109 | Seven X Ranch Inc | Brockway, MT 59214 | $370,573 |
110 | Wanmdi Kinyan Inc | Redstone, MT 59257 | $367,341 |
111 | Camrose Colony Inc | Ledger, MT 59456 | $367,148 |
112 | Kevin Nelson | Richland, MT 59260 | $366,378 |
113 | Greg D Lacock | Hinsdale, MT 59241 | $366,271 |
114 | Ross C Oakland | Glendive, MT 59330 | $366,033 |
115 | Riverview Colony Inc | Chester, MT 59522 | $364,114 |
116 | Boyce Paul Lacock | Larslan, MT 59244 | $363,946 |
117 | Surprise Creek Hutterian Brethern | Stanford, MT 59479 | $363,621 |
118 | Kenneth H Mckerlick | Jordan, MT 59337 | $362,636 |
119 | Countryview Ranch Inc | Wibaux, MT 59353 | $361,330 |
120 | Camas Creek Cattle & Sheep Co | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $360,749 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”