Total Disaster Programs in Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 8,822
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Montana totaled $174,033,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Donald F Jenni | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $174,320 |
102 | , | $173,732 | |
103 | , | $172,176 | |
104 | Cummings Farm | Cascade, MT 59421 | $172,080 |
105 | Boschee Grain & Livestock Joint Venture | Dodson, MT 59524 | $171,132 |
106 | Nathan & Billie Jo Simons Jv | Turner, MT 59542 | $170,436 |
107 | Horizon Colony Inc | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $169,592 |
108 | Matthew Shane Anderson | Malta, MT 59538 | $168,593 |
109 | Gollehon Ranch LLC | Choteau, MT 59422 | $168,281 |
110 | Forder Land & Cattle Co | Highwood, MT 59450 | $167,850 |
111 | Jason And Tanya Brewer | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $167,661 |
112 | B & C French LLC | Malta, MT 59538 | $167,155 |
113 | Silver Spring Ranch | Sheridan, MT 59749 | $166,814 |
114 | Obrecht Cattle Company, Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $165,364 |
115 | Kane Ranch LLC | Stanford, MT 59479 | $164,783 |
116 | Deerfield Hutterian Brethren Inc | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $162,983 |
117 | Glass Farm & Ranch Company | Denton, MT 59430 | $162,140 |
118 | Big-sky Kellam Land & Livestock Corporation | Chinook, MT 59523 | $161,550 |
119 | Weaver Cattle Co | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $161,253 |
120 | Montgomery Ranch Co | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $161,226 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”