Emergency Conservation Program in Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 307
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Montana totaled $8,785,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Michael L Jones | Hinsdale, MT 59241 | $22,922 |
122 | Daniel Hartman | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $22,721 |
123 | Dillon Bros Inc | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $22,501 |
124 | Clara Thiessen Inc, V Bouchard, Allen Thiessen, Do | Lambert, MT 59243 | $22,408 |
125 | Dan Rader | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $22,329 |
126 | Michael A Skillestad | Glendive, MT 59330 | $22,263 |
127 | C Stark Ickes | Bighorn, MT 59010 | $22,224 |
128 | Mcgill Land & Livestock Inc | Powderville, MT 59345 | $21,744 |
129 | Trent D Goettlich | Hilger, MT 59451 | $21,542 |
130 | Matthew R Wickens | Winifred, MT 59489 | $21,411 |
131 | Ry R Oconnor | Plevna, MT 59344 | $21,252 |
132 | Soda Creek Inc | Circle, MT 59215 | $20,724 |
133 | Walter Schweitzer | Geyser, MT 59447 | $20,254 |
134 | Diamond V Corp | Glendive, MT 59330 | $20,173 |
135 | Shahriar Anoushfar | Fort Kent, ME 04743 | $19,947 |
136 | Nathan Louis Williams | Richey, MT 59259 | $19,883 |
137 | Douglas D Unruh | Bloomfield, MT 59315 | $19,748 |
138 | Greg Field Dba Tri Mountain Angus | Townsend, MT 59644 | $19,651 |
139 | Kniepkamp Inc | Lindsay, MT 59339 | $19,651 |
140 | Timothy Donnelly | Miles City, MT 59301 | $19,638 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”