Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 6,049
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Montana totaled $147,234,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Myers Ranch Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $162,212 |
162 | Daniel J Mikulecky | Rudyard, MT 59540 | $161,500 |
163 | Cybulski Brothers | Custer, MT 59024 | $161,401 |
164 | James White | Havre, MT 59501 | $159,969 |
165 | S & H Farms Inc | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $159,965 |
166 | David Engstrom Inc | Medicine Lake, MT 59247 | $158,891 |
167 | Nourish Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $157,877 |
168 | Rieger Cattle Co | Ismay, MT 59336 | $157,378 |
169 | B & V Tilleman Farms | Chinook, MT 59523 | $157,055 |
170 | Alfred Jordan Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $156,503 |
171 | Jorgenson Farms Inc | Gildford, MT 59525 | $156,444 |
172 | Timothy J Bellon | Nashua, MT 59248 | $156,253 |
173 | Oscar - The Oscar & J Trunk | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $156,188 |
174 | John W Cowell | Harlem, MT 59526 | $156,164 |
175 | Dale Tarum & Company Inc | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $155,817 |
176 | Prairie Rose Limited Partnership | Chester, MT 59522 | $154,559 |
177 | Fast Ag Inc | Lustre, MT 59225 | $154,368 |
178 | Klindworth Farms Inc | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $153,880 |
179 | Buggy Creek Livestock Lllp | Glasgow, MT 59230 | $153,755 |
180 | C & M Warren Inc | Hingham, MT 59528 | $153,322 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”