Emergency Conservation Program in Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 307
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Montana totaled $8,785,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Torske Land & Livestock | Hardin, MT 59034 | $216,228 |
2 | Dan Boyce | Winifred, MT 59489 | $205,588 |
3 | Theodore Herzog | Miles City, MT 59301 | $200,148 |
4 | Linse Ranch Trust | Denton, MT 59430 | $160,917 |
5 | Devils Elbow Ranch LLC | Brockton, MT 59213 | $155,406 |
6 | , | $147,018 | |
7 | Grebe Family Limited Partnership | Melstone, MT 59054 | $115,039 |
8 | Beau Kirk Carter | Denton, MT 59430 | $111,705 |
9 | Paul Diegel | Valley City, ND 58072 | $109,116 |
10 | Schmechel Farming Partnership | Helena, MT 59601 | $103,203 |
11 | Skyhook Land & Cattle LLC | Geyser, MT 59447 | $102,845 |
12 | Roxanne R Harding | Miles City, MT 59301 | $96,994 |
13 | Howard Ranch Inc | Hysham, MT 59038 | $91,781 |
14 | Harbaugh Ranch Co | Jordan, MT 59337 | $90,231 |
15 | Anthony Kuhry | Grass Range, MT 59032 | $89,593 |
16 | Christ Dennis Hjorth | Shepherd, MT 59079 | $88,582 |
17 | William D Doman | Winnett, MT 59087 | $88,307 |
18 | Alan Vanek | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $81,514 |
19 | Hammond Cattle Co. | Hardin, MT 59034 | $80,317 |
20 | , | $80,305 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>