Conservation Reserve Program in Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 18,793
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Montana totaled $2,323,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Highlander Farm | Miles City, MT 59301 | $1,850,403 |
22 | Lonesome Dove Grain Co & Schulen | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $1,768,197 |
23 | Me 2 Ag Partners | Billings, MT 59105 | $1,754,336 |
24 | H & H Farming | Miles City, MT 59301 | $1,744,836 |
25 | Louie Petrie Ranch Partnership | Turner, MT 59542 | $1,724,593 |
26 | Beaverslide Ventures | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $1,699,392 |
27 | Neil Johnson Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,693,832 |
28 | Bidegaray Farming | Bozeman, MT 59715 | $1,653,600 |
29 | Bliss Farms Partnership | Conrad, MT 59425 | $1,650,781 |
30 | Tri-can Ag | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $1,625,346 |
31 | Blackfeet Tribe | Browning, MT 59417 | $1,605,420 |
32 | Rainbow Ranch Partnership | Oxnard, CA 93035 | $1,593,518 |
33 | Krd Farms | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $1,535,261 |
34 | The Dykema Ranch Partnership | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $1,524,421 |
35 | Forman Family Farms | Mansfield, TX 76063 | $1,512,901 |
36 | R & S Grain | Shelby, MT 59474 | $1,502,089 |
37 | Jsks Pattison Ptnrshp | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,499,981 |
38 | Tranel Ranch | Billings, MT 59106 | $1,486,463 |
39 | Iceland Farms | Ethridge, MT 59435 | $1,466,334 |
40 | Knerr Ranch | Roy, MT 59471 | $1,431,061 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”