Conservation Reserve Program in Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 18,793
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Montana totaled $2,323,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Cronk Ranch Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $1,161,017 |
82 | Reversed R Livestock | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $1,158,364 |
83 | S W & Crew | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,154,740 |
84 | Welsh Land & Cattle Co | Havre, MT 59501 | $1,149,072 |
85 | Dry Fork Farms Tribal Corporation | Box Elder, MT 59521 | $1,148,168 |
86 | Benny L Milks | Billings, MT 59101 | $1,143,354 |
87 | Parrott Land And Cattle | Sheridan, WY 82801 | $1,127,840 |
88 | R & L Farms | Joplin, MT 59531 | $1,125,972 |
89 | Deep Creek Grazing Assoc Inc | Choteau, MT 59422 | $1,118,487 |
90 | Kamp Partnership | Manhattan, MT 59741 | $1,113,590 |
91 | Barbara B Lehnerz | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $1,113,352 |
92 | Veseth And Veseth Lvst Co Inc | Malta, MT 59538 | $1,112,202 |
93 | Cash Coulee Ltd | Augusta, MT 59410 | $1,108,751 |
94 | Eagle Land Company | Winifred, MT 59489 | $1,104,341 |
95 | Wolff Ranch Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $1,097,405 |
96 | Timberline Ranch | Polson, MT 59860 | $1,095,264 |
97 | Fauth Ranch | Lavina, MT 59046 | $1,094,526 |
98 | Alfred B Guthrie III Rev Tr | Choteau, MT 59422 | $1,087,032 |
99 | Sun Ag Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $1,086,837 |
100 | Abn Ranch Inc | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $1,085,972 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”