Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 17,005
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Montana totaled $777,917,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Three B Farms Partnership | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $1,172,635 |
22 | 3x Farms | Chinook, MT 59523 | $1,026,536 |
23 | Schuler Bros | Carter, MT 59420 | $1,003,216 |
24 | Bliss Farms Partnership | Conrad, MT 59425 | $920,900 |
25 | Cgw Farms | Fort Benton, MT 59442 | $860,084 |
26 | Jsks Pattison Ptnrshp | Havre, MT 59501 | $850,009 |
27 | Larry J & Gene C Billmayer Ptr | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $837,942 |
28 | D B Kraft Farms | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $829,162 |
29 | Western Coop Credit Union ** | Williston, ND 58802 | $825,221 |
30 | Renner Farms J V | Larslan, MT 59244 | $820,175 |
31 | Silverado Farms II | Geraldine, MT 59446 | $814,401 |
32 | Becker Farming | Billings, MT 59101 | $811,648 |
33 | Huber Ranch | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $772,306 |
34 | Van Dessel & Sons | Joplin, MT 59531 | $772,182 |
35 | Kolstad Farms | Ledger, MT 59456 | $766,260 |
36 | Robert E Stephens Jr | Augusta, MT 59410 | $696,203 |
37 | R & L Farms | Joplin, MT 59531 | $692,210 |
38 | Solberg Ag | Box Elder, MT 59521 | $691,710 |
39 | North Harlem Hutterian Brethren Inc | Harlem, MT 59526 | $686,381 |
40 | Catlin Ranch Lp | White Sulphur Spring, MT 59645 | $662,006 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”