SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,028
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Montana totaled $136,759,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Buffalo Flats Farm Llp | Medicine Lake, MT 59247 | $284,726 |
22 | Houg Farms Inc | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $281,169 |
23 | B Bar M Inc | Lewistown, MT 59457 | $264,794 |
24 | Aageson Grain & Cattle | Gildford, MT 59525 | $255,250 |
25 | Roger E Senef | Coffee Creek, MT 59424 | $247,708 |
26 | Glenn R Berg | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $247,489 |
27 | Jana Wolery Farms | Inverness, MT 59530 | $240,614 |
28 | Wild Wheat Ranch | Kalispell, MT 59904 | $239,239 |
29 | Marvin Pospisil | Moore, MT 59464 | $238,251 |
30 | Smith Farms | Poplar, MT 59255 | $235,763 |
31 | Sternberg Farms Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $235,427 |
32 | Coulee Hill Ranch | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $230,806 |
33 | Unrau Inc | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $229,695 |
34 | Golden Acres Farm Inc | Brady, MT 59416 | $227,833 |
35 | Sioux Pass Livestock And Grain | Lodge Grass, MT 59050 | $227,817 |
36 | Traeholt Farms | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $225,469 |
37 | Roger Sammons | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $224,899 |
38 | Jeff Good | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $224,441 |
39 | Double L Incorporated | Chester, MT 59522 | $224,281 |
40 | Douglas A Ross | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $218,329 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”