Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Montana, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,301

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Montana totaled $33,291,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
41G & J Hay LLCBozeman, MT 59719$65,492
42Tracy L ForcellaTerry, MT 59349$65,293
43Neil TurnbullBrockton, MT 59213$64,933
44Hahn RanchTownsend, MT 59644$63,863
45Talan IncOvando, MT 59854$63,817
46Icopini Farms IncHysham, MT 59038$62,126
47Lazy D Bar Seven Ranch IncBillings, MT 59102$61,393
48Benzel Brothers FarmHardin, MT 59034$61,200
49Cross Bar IncHysham, MT 59038$59,516
50Richard L GardnerShepherd, MT 59079$59,084
51Thomas J IrigoinLambert, MT 59243$58,412
52Meine BrosDillon, MT 59725$58,411
53Sauerbier Ranches IncAlder, MT 59710$57,885
54Steve ArchambaultHarlem, MT 59526$57,782
55Robert DellitSumatra, MT 59083$57,326
56Leo And Dan HoranMoore, MT 59464$57,134
57Morkrid Farms IncChester, MT 59522$56,966
58Edward A DallaserraPhilipsburg, MT 59858$56,741
59Richard R ClineDeer Lodge, MT 59722$56,659
60Rio Land & Investment Company IncAtlanta, GA 30309$56,458

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag