Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Beaverhead County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 137
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Beaverhead County, Montana totaled $3,744,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | E Bar Enterprises, LLC | Dillon, MT 59725 | $4,773 |
102 | Sauerbier Ranches Inc | Alder, MT 59710 | $4,545 |
103 | Wisdom River Cattle Company | Wisdom, MT 59761 | $4,391 |
104 | Conover Ranch, LLC | Dillon, MT 59725 | $4,334 |
105 | Divide Creek Cattle Co Inc | Divide, MT 59727 | $3,710 |
106 | Kristi G Pancost | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $3,021 |
107 | Sitz Land And Cattle LLC | Dillon, MT 59725 | $2,974 |
108 | Kalsta Ranch Co Inc | Glen, MT 59732 | $2,972 |
109 | John J Broksle Jr | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $2,834 |
110 | Cindy Sue Ashcraft | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $2,754 |
111 | Beaverhead 7 Up Ranch | Dillon, MT 59725 | $2,744 |
112 | Dallaserra Ranches | Dillon, MT 59725 | $2,543 |
113 | Box S, LLC | Dillon, MT 59725 | $2,498 |
114 | William R Grose | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $2,453 |
115 | Jesse Peterson | Dillon, MT 59725 | $2,374 |
116 | Larry J Pancost | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $2,317 |
117 | David Ashcraft | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $2,295 |
118 | Wayne Potter | Dell, MT 59724 | $2,276 |
119 | John M Peck | Melrose, MT 59743 | $1,751 |
120 | Broksle Ranch Inc | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $1,607 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”