Direct Payment Program in Big Horn County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 634
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Big Horn County, Montana totaled $23,114,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | S Ranch Land LLC | Pryor, MT 59066 | $644,545 |
2 | Patriot Farms | Billings, MT 59107 | $617,707 |
3 | Sioux Pass Livestock And Grain | Lodge Grass, MT 59050 | $419,428 |
4 | Rainbow Point Farms | Saint Xavier, MT 59075 | $417,830 |
5 | Nedens Farms Inc | Hardin, MT 59034 | $402,276 |
6 | Nessan Brothers Ag | Billings, MT 59102 | $381,891 |
7 | Nessan Farms Partnership | Billings, MT 59103 | $330,342 |
8 | Me 2 Ag Partners | Billings, MT 59105 | $302,328 |
9 | Helen Uffelman | Hardin, MT 59034 | $294,837 |
10 | William Uffelman | Hardin, MT 59034 | $294,836 |
11 | Koyama Farms Inc | Hardin, MT 59034 | $294,052 |
12 | Ellis Edward Murdock | Lodge Grass, MT 59050 | $289,437 |
13 | Torske Land & Livestock | Hardin, MT 59034 | $275,939 |
14 | Four Corners Farm Co | Billings, MT 59103 | $273,387 |
15 | T & C Farm Co | Billings, MT 59103 | $272,966 |
16 | John J Yerger | Hardin, MT 59034 | $271,049 |
17 | Lamar Ranching Co | Livingston, MT 59047 | $265,800 |
18 | Daum Ranch | Billings, MT 59101 | $253,548 |
19 | Three B Farms Partnership | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $244,235 |
20 | Hay Coulee Farm Co | Billings, MT 59103 | $243,703 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>