Farm Subsidy information
Blaine County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Blaine County, Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 468
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Blaine County, Montana totaled $19,343,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Sulfur Creek Cattle Co | Lloyd, MT 59535 | $112,797 |
22 | Clear Creek Angus | Chinook, MT 59523 | $111,947 |
23 | Gerald J Walsh | Dodson, MT 59524 | $111,886 |
24 | Bardanouve Ranch | Harlem, MT 59526 | $104,624 |
25 | Scott E Snider | Turner, MT 59542 | $103,371 |
26 | Robert Munson | Chinook, MT 59523 | $99,000 |
27 | Nf Farms LLC | Chinook, MT 59523 | $98,700 |
28 | Clayton Hofeldt | Lloyd, MT 59535 | $97,517 |
29 | Stuker Ranch | Chinook, MT 59523 | $96,265 |
30 | Lone Tree Cattle Co Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $95,878 |
31 | Hartland Colony Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $95,129 |
32 | Snider Ranch Co | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $93,734 |
33 | , | $92,160 | |
34 | Conrad Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $87,286 |
35 | Keith M Cowan | Turner, MT 59542 | $86,931 |
36 | Nace Ranch Co | Turner, MT 59542 | $82,428 |
37 | Davies Ranch Company | Chinook, MT 59523 | $78,526 |
38 | Douglas F Hofeldt | Chinook, MT 59523 | $78,191 |
39 | Chris G Nemetz | Chinook, MT 59523 | $76,569 |
40 | Branden Charles Hammond | Harlem, MT 59526 | $74,151 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”