Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Blaine County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 273
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Blaine County, Montana totaled $5,921,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Holly Jo Marie Engle | Chinook, MT 59523 | $54,689 |
22 | Fort Belknap Indian Comm | Harlem, MT 59526 | $51,932 |
23 | Larry J Billmayer | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $51,413 |
24 | Dennis G Webb | Dodson, MT 59524 | $51,297 |
25 | Jim L Anderson | Chinook, MT 59523 | $50,059 |
26 | Nathan & Billie Jo Simons Jv | Turner, MT 59542 | $48,189 |
27 | Paul Niederegger | Chinook, MT 59523 | $47,655 |
28 | Milton Raymond Werk | Dodson, MT 59524 | $47,530 |
29 | Robert Munson | Chinook, MT 59523 | $47,492 |
30 | Rodney B Hofeldt | Lloyd, MT 59535 | $46,250 |
31 | Lone Tree Cattle Co Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $44,735 |
32 | Olson Livestock Co | Chinook, MT 59523 | $43,667 |
33 | Big-sky Kellam Land & Livestock Corporation | Chinook, MT 59523 | $42,612 |
34 | , | $40,729 | |
35 | Unruh Ranch Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $40,553 |
36 | John W Young | Lloyd, MT 59535 | $39,772 |
37 | Kimmel Ranch Partnership | Turner, MT 59542 | $39,750 |
38 | Mardy Cox | Chinook, MT 59523 | $38,556 |
39 | Rhenda Frey | Harlem, MT 59526 | $38,373 |
40 | Travis J Liddle | Chinook, MT 59523 | $38,087 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”