Farm Subsidy information
Blaine County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Blaine County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 625
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Blaine County, Montana totaled $17,990,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Christopher A Skoyen | Chinook, MT 59523 | $75,400 |
42 | Grabofsky Livestock & Grain Inc | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $74,508 |
43 | Jones Bros | Turner, MT 59542 | $74,246 |
44 | Cherry Ridge Ranch Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $74,169 |
45 | Michael J Van Voast | Chinook, MT 59523 | $71,754 |
46 | Rainbow Irrigation | Chinook, MT 59523 | $69,789 |
47 | Colter Cederberg | Turner, MT 59542 | $69,526 |
48 | Golden Organic Wheat Farms Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $68,393 |
49 | Stockman Bank ** | Conrad, MT 59425 | $68,286 |
50 | Rhenda Frey | Harlem, MT 59526 | $68,042 |
51 | G Scott Friede | Chinook, MT 59523 | $65,535 |
52 | Wolery Grain & Livestock Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $62,687 |
53 | Cronk Ranch Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $61,849 |
54 | Ryan C Lankford | Chinook, MT 59523 | $59,820 |
55 | Triple K Farms Ptr | Chinook, MT 59523 | $58,545 |
56 | G & S Partners | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $58,161 |
57 | Kiedrowski Farms Inc | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $57,663 |
58 | Paul A Niederegger | Harlem, MT 59526 | $57,575 |
59 | Schellin Ranch | Chinook, MT 59523 | $56,960 |
60 | Zellmer Seed & Grain | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $56,600 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”