Farm Subsidy information
Blaine County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Blaine County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 435
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Blaine County, Montana totaled $34,076,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Fisher Seed Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $167,269 |
42 | Cherry Ridge Ranch Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $163,802 |
43 | Klindworth Farms Inc | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $163,799 |
44 | Cleveland Creek Ranch Co | Chinook, MT 59523 | $160,258 |
45 | Nathan & Billie Jo Simons Jv | Turner, MT 59542 | $158,575 |
46 | Gordon M Young | Chinook, MT 59523 | $154,292 |
47 | Zellmer Seed & Grain | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $153,244 |
48 | Douglas F Hofeldt | Chinook, MT 59523 | $141,583 |
49 | Little Bear Creek Farm | Chinook, MT 59523 | $140,198 |
50 | Little Jewel Farm Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $138,018 |
51 | Wolery Grain & Livestock Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $133,639 |
52 | Branden Charles Hammond | Harlem, MT 59526 | $133,283 |
53 | Alisha L Herdegen | Chinook, MT 59523 | $131,114 |
54 | Lazy E R Ranch Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $129,311 |
55 | Jnk Farms Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $129,206 |
56 | Hill Grain Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $126,688 |
57 | Conrad Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $126,516 |
58 | Brown Family Organic Farms Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $126,443 |
59 | G Scott Friede | Chinook, MT 59523 | $125,627 |
60 | Unruh Ranch Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $124,575 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”