Total Emergency Relief Program in Blaine County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 175
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Blaine County, Montana totaled $11,897,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Aaron Niederegger | Harlem, MT 59526 | $41,015 |
82 | Dean L Baker | Harlem, MT 59526 | $40,671 |
83 | Kenneth David Jensen | Chinook, MT 59523 | $40,280 |
84 | Fx Bar Ranch Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $39,894 |
85 | Hot Rod Ranch Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $39,266 |
86 | Rockin T 3 Farms | Chinook, MT 59523 | $38,452 |
87 | Kristin Billmayer Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $38,174 |
88 | Rocky Road Farms Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $36,023 |
89 | Chester L Fouts | Turner, MT 59542 | $35,724 |
90 | Conrad Farms Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $35,513 |
91 | Darel Hauge | Turner, MT 59542 | $33,283 |
92 | Scott Gunderson | Chinook, MT 59523 | $31,807 |
93 | Van Voast Brothers | Turner, MT 59542 | $31,395 |
94 | Harmon Ag & Machine Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $31,173 |
95 | Carol Struck | Woodbury, MN 55125 | $30,992 |
96 | Christopher A Skoyen | Chinook, MT 59523 | $30,593 |
97 | Frey Inc | Harlem, MT 59526 | $29,953 |
98 | Richard M Calvert | Harlem, MT 59526 | $28,945 |
99 | Edward A Olson | Havre, MT 59501 | $28,831 |
100 | Brian Thomas Calvert | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $28,790 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”