Farm Subsidy information
Blaine County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Blaine County, Montana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 649
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Blaine County, Montana totaled $26,590,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Kimmel Ranch Partnership | Turner, MT 59542 | $172,831 |
| 22 | Mitchell Ranch Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $163,276 |
| 23 | Glacier Bank ** | Choteau, MT 59422 | $156,645 |
| 24 | Krass Farms Inc | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $155,229 |
| 25 | Hinebauch Grain Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $150,858 |
| 26 | R L Lankford Farms Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $146,798 |
| 27 | Tlc Farms Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $145,281 |
| 28 | Van Voast Ranch | Turner, MT 59542 | $140,614 |
| 29 | Bardanouve Ranch | Harlem, MT 59526 | $140,350 |
| 30 | Nicholson Grain Farms | Chinook, MT 59523 | $136,581 |
| 31 | Heilig Farms LLC | Turner, MT 59542 | $132,110 |
| 32 | Rhenda Frey | Harlem, MT 59526 | $130,350 |
| 33 | Buhmann Apiaries Inc | Zurich, MT 59547 | $126,921 |
| 34 | Warren Lybeck | Chinook, MT 59523 | $126,161 |
| 35 | Michael John Tilleman | Havre, MT 59501 | $123,348 |
| 36 | Robert Munson | Chinook, MT 59523 | $123,200 |
| 37 | Little Bear Creek Farm | Chinook, MT 59523 | $121,185 |
| 38 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $120,791 |
| 39 | John W Cowell | Harlem, MT 59526 | $112,815 |
| 40 | B & V Tilleman Farms | Chinook, MT 59523 | $111,785 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf