Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Blaine County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 251
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Blaine County, Montana totaled $7,976,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Independence Bank ** | Havre, MT 59501 | $545,824 |
2 | R L Lankford Farms Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $211,356 |
3 | A W Billmayer Inc | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $188,958 |
4 | Rhenda Frey | Harlem, MT 59526 | $187,166 |
5 | Jerry L Lankford | Dodson, MT 59524 | $168,066 |
6 | Briese Brothers Havre | Havre, MT 59501 | $158,289 |
7 | Klindworth Farms Inc | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $153,880 |
8 | B & V Tilleman Farms | Chinook, MT 59523 | $150,923 |
9 | Myers Ranch Inc | Havre, MT 59501 | $143,581 |
10 | Snider Edward J & Vicki J | Harlem, MT 59526 | $142,398 |
11 | Little Jewel Farm Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $138,864 |
12 | Fouts Farms Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $137,929 |
13 | Wolery Grain & Livestock Inc | Turner, MT 59542 | $135,688 |
14 | Floyd Frey | Harlem, MT 59526 | $124,655 |
15 | Cherry Ridge Ranch Inc | Chinook, MT 59523 | $121,888 |
16 | Nace Ranch Co | Turner, MT 59542 | $121,784 |
17 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $118,147 |
18 | Shawn Beck | Hogeland, MT 59529 | $117,668 |
19 | Lone Tree Cattle Co Inc | Big Sandy, MT 59520 | $116,919 |
20 | Ryan Clyde Lankford | Chinook, MT 59523 | $115,210 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>