Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Carbon County, Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 157
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Carbon County, Montana totaled $410,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Cayuse Livestock Co | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $1,768 |
62 | M T Livestock Co | Powell, WY 82435 | $1,746 |
63 | Ross Taylor Schwend | Bridger, MT 59014 | $1,642 |
64 | , | $1,516 | |
65 | Cole Daniel Schwend | Bridger, MT 59014 | $1,507 |
66 | Jeffrey Wayne Berger | Williston, ND 58802 | $1,479 |
67 | Bryan Knaub | Laurel, MT 59044 | $1,441 |
68 | Barry Klingaman | Bridger, MT 59014 | $1,420 |
69 | Mark Richards | Bridger, MT 59014 | $1,405 |
70 | John T Patterson | Columbus, MT 59019 | $1,365 |
71 | Phillip Nardinger | Joliet, MT 59041 | $1,362 |
72 | George A Mathes | Roberts, MT 59070 | $1,344 |
73 | Christopher Lynn Coombe | Edgar, MT 59026 | $1,337 |
74 | Allen O Eik | Joliet, MT 59041 | $1,334 |
75 | Roger M Braten | Roberts, MT 59070 | $1,309 |
76 | Lloyd Zumbrun Jr | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $1,287 |
77 | Frank J Cole III | Red Lodge, MT 59068 | $1,266 |
78 | , | $1,249 | |
79 | Gary L Evertz | Joliet, MT 59041 | $1,242 |
80 | Merrill G Pfeifer | Bridger, MT 59014 | $1,241 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”