Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Carbon County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 306
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Carbon County, Montana totaled $3,312,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | John Mohr | Joliet, MT 59041 | $9,373 |
102 | Chester J Ballek | Red Lodge, MT 59068 | $9,163 |
103 | Gabrian Ranch Inc | Red Lodge, MT 59068 | $8,745 |
104 | Everett Hoines | Red Lodge, MT 59068 | $8,622 |
105 | William Craig Durham | Belfry, MT 59008 | $8,390 |
106 | Sandy Morgan | Bridger, MT 59014 | $8,385 |
107 | Jeffrey R Krook | Roberts, MT 59070 | $8,197 |
108 | Leonard J Vanek | Silesia, MT 59041 | $8,195 |
109 | Moore Cattle LLC | Billings, MT 59107 | $8,044 |
110 | Marilyn Weast | Red Lodge, MT 59068 | $7,869 |
111 | Stark Farms Limited Partnership | Roberts, MT 59070 | $7,796 |
112 | Jess Donohoe | Red Lodge, MT 59068 | $7,755 |
113 | Kenneth B Herden | Belfry, MT 59008 | $7,755 |
114 | Centana Feed Yard LLC | Joliet, MT 59041 | $7,736 |
115 | Clint Lowell Peterson | Bridger, MT 59014 | $7,721 |
116 | Lorra Mitzkus | Red Lodge, MT 59068 | $7,370 |
117 | Ty L Schwend | Bridger, MT 59014 | $7,260 |
118 | J O Hash III | Roscoe, MT 59071 | $7,205 |
119 | George A Mathes | Roberts, MT 59070 | $7,170 |
120 | Kenneth J Pfeifer | Bridger, MT 59014 | $7,117 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”