Farm Subsidy information
Carter County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Carter County, Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 195
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Carter County, Montana totaled $4,480,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Castleberry Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $8,903 |
62 | F & R Ranches Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $8,850 |
63 | Corral Creek Livestock | Hammond, MT 59332 | $8,351 |
64 | Randell Gene Arpan | Alzada, MT 59311 | $8,247 |
65 | Leroy Schallenberger | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $8,077 |
66 | Minnesota Supreme Feeders Inc | Lamberton, MN 56152 | $8,038 |
67 | Britt C Williams | Hammond, MT 59332 | $7,738 |
68 | Blair Brothers LLC | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $7,681 |
69 | Scott Kittelmann | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $7,496 |
70 | Markuson Ranch | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $7,150 |
71 | Mccabe Ag | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $6,948 |
72 | Josh O Stieg | Baker, MT 59313 | $6,820 |
73 | Gregory A Harris Sr | Baker, MT 59313 | $6,777 |
74 | Betty Simonitsch | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $6,774 |
75 | Willow Creek Partners Llp | Greenwich, CT 06830 | $6,697 |
76 | Zach Elmore | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $6,296 |
77 | The Bank Of Baker ** | Baker, MT 59313 | $6,270 |
78 | Brownfield Ranch Inc | Hammond, MT 59332 | $6,133 |
79 | Ralph Brownfield | Hammond, MT 59332 | $6,072 |
80 | Luther Waterland | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $5,920 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”