Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Carter County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 123
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Carter County, Montana totaled $1,060,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Patrick Richard Claeys | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $2,912 |
82 | Sarafina Ann Claeys | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $2,912 |
83 | Beach Farms Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $2,720 |
84 | Luther Waterland | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $2,503 |
85 | Charles Brence | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $2,499 |
86 | Dale King | Hammond, MT 59332 | $2,418 |
87 | Gregory A Harris Sr | Baker, MT 59313 | $2,355 |
88 | Allen Elmore | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $1,948 |
89 | Steven J Mills | Boyes, MT 59316 | $1,887 |
90 | 2do LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $1,835 |
91 | Jerry Cathey | Hammond, MT 59332 | $1,833 |
92 | Kenneth W Schultz | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $1,610 |
93 | Elvin C Peabody Estate Trust | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $1,595 |
94 | Jacob L Hieb | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $1,586 |
95 | Danny Lanning | Alzada, MT 59311 | $1,531 |
96 | Dalene Grace Sleeman | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $1,506 |
97 | C & M Partnership Llp | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $1,451 |
98 | Jerry D Cline | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $1,279 |
99 | S & L Sheep Ranch Inc | Alzada, MT 59311 | $1,219 |
100 | J & J Livestock Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $1,171 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”