Farm Subsidy information
Carter County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Carter County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 939
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Carter County, Montana totaled $150,140,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jason King | Hammond, MT 59332 | $430,508 |
82 | Robert J Wilson | Alzada, MT 59311 | $427,318 |
83 | William C Frye | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $419,964 |
84 | Everette Flasted | Alzada, MT 59311 | $418,423 |
85 | C & M Partnership Llp | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $417,038 |
86 | Robert D Arpan | Alzada, MT 59311 | $413,273 |
87 | Lucas Anthony Waterland | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $408,973 |
88 | Greg Williams Ranch Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $402,538 |
89 | Lester Gale Phillippi | Hammond, MT 59332 | $401,736 |
90 | Curry Ranch Inc | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $401,216 |
91 | Homer F Harrington | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $400,599 |
92 | William R Lambert | Hammond, MT 59332 | $399,661 |
93 | James L Tetrault | Camp Crook, SD 57724 | $395,498 |
94 | Kendall E Macer | Cloverdale, CA 95425 | $395,022 |
95 | Maureen Nixon | Alzada, MT 59311 | $392,577 |
96 | Padden Partnership | Camp Crook, SD 57724 | $388,528 |
97 | Donald Nixon | Alzada, MT 59311 | $384,490 |
98 | Roger & Judy Bonefield Joint Revo | Capitol, MT 59319 | $384,125 |
99 | Randy Bickel | Miles City, MT 59301 | $380,890 |
100 | Jacob L Hieb | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $371,283 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”