Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Carter County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 165
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Carter County, Montana totaled $6,333,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jesse C Labree | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $25,993 |
82 | Myron Johnston | Hammond, MT 59332 | $25,614 |
83 | Laird Ranch LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $25,311 |
84 | Sum Livestock LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $24,004 |
85 | Charles Parks | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $23,487 |
86 | Garman Ranch Revocable Trust - Eileen Garman | Alzada, MT 59311 | $23,457 |
87 | Levi Haefner | Capitol, MT 59319 | $23,421 |
88 | Luther Waterland | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $22,920 |
89 | , | $22,842 | |
90 | Steven Troy Mills | Boyes, MT 59316 | $22,575 |
91 | Jeffery Elmore | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $22,498 |
92 | Shanna Howell | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $21,460 |
93 | Tim Tooke | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $21,045 |
94 | Britt C Williams | Hammond, MT 59332 | $20,590 |
95 | Borchgrevink Livestock | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $19,053 |
96 | William R Roadifer | Camp Crook, SD 57724 | $19,023 |
97 | Justin Kerr | Capitol, MT 59319 | $18,789 |
98 | Donna Guyer | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $18,457 |
99 | Jerry Cathey | Hammond, MT 59332 | $17,241 |
100 | Patrick Richard Claeys | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $17,018 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”