Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Carter County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 456
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Carter County, Montana totaled $8,342,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Alkali Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $21,976 |
122 | Roger E Nies Estate | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $21,536 |
123 | Cx Ranch Inc | Glendive, MT 59330 | $21,526 |
124 | Frank J Nies | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $21,382 |
125 | Charles Oleson | Beulah, WY 82712 | $21,349 |
126 | Danny L Viergets | Alzada, MT 59311 | $20,328 |
127 | Leo Sterns | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $20,094 |
128 | The Tom & Margaret Blair Trust | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $20,051 |
129 | Shepherd Ranch Inc | Baker, MT 59313 | $19,955 |
130 | 2do LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $19,831 |
131 | Laurence D Lambert Estate | Ismay, MT 59336 | $19,137 |
132 | Don Harpster | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $18,368 |
133 | Floyd Daniel Pierce | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $18,302 |
134 | Renetta Phillippi | Hammond, MT 59332 | $17,811 |
135 | Ella Oleson | Beulah, WY 82712 | $17,135 |
136 | J & M Cattle Company | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $16,770 |
137 | Tait Teigen Estate | Capitol, MT 59319 | $16,658 |
138 | Williams Ranches Inc | Greenwich, CT 06830 | $16,648 |
139 | The Drovers | Camp Crook, SD 57724 | $16,567 |
140 | Kenneth Schweigert | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $16,230 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”