Total Conservation Programs in Carter County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 222
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Carter County, Montana totaled $12,928,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Melvin ///horton Estate | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $16,787 |
122 | Jb Cattle Company | Plevna, MT 59344 | $16,655 |
123 | Dennis Bowmer | Las Vegas, NV 89121 | $16,608 |
124 | David J Gross | Gillette, WY 82717 | $16,430 |
125 | Wd & Jc Marshall 2003 Family Trus | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $15,888 |
126 | Jerry Harkins | Billings, MT 59101 | $15,753 |
127 | Michael Hutton | Hager City, WI 54014 | $15,693 |
128 | John Kerr Estate | Camp Crook, SD 57724 | $15,570 |
129 | Bar K Diamond Ranch Inc | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $15,368 |
130 | Richard Yates | Hammond, MT 59332 | $15,345 |
131 | Milton T Markuson | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $15,241 |
132 | Chester And Rona Meyer Family Tru | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $15,009 |
133 | James L Tetrault | Camp Crook, SD 57724 | $14,996 |
134 | Tyree J Oconnor | Broadus, MT 59317 | $14,346 |
135 | Donald L Wolff | Miles City, MT 59301 | $14,279 |
136 | Tim Tooke | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $14,054 |
137 | Ivan Ray Jardee | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $13,785 |
138 | Pete R Enos | Baker, MT 59313 | $12,740 |
139 | J Mark Enos | Baker, MT 59313 | $12,740 |
140 | Betty Hutton | Gillette, WY 82716 | $12,526 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”