Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Carter County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 242
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Carter County, Montana totaled $12,643,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 6 Creeks Farm | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $443,148 |
2 | Thomas Ranch Inc | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $348,652 |
3 | Steve Stoddard | Broadus, MT 59317 | $262,086 |
4 | Cross W Livestock LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $248,801 |
5 | Pilster Ranch Corp | Alzada, MT 59311 | $240,239 |
6 | Lee Labree | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $233,716 |
7 | Harmon Creek Cattle LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $215,515 |
8 | Arledge Livestock Company LLC | Robert Lee, TX 76945 | $214,172 |
9 | Wolff Ranch Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $195,460 |
10 | Ronda K Cordell | Camp Crook, SD 57724 | $193,051 |
11 | Loehding Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $191,201 |
12 | Courtney Herefords | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $178,230 |
13 | Tooke Ranch Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $175,887 |
14 | Occ-o'connor Crops & Cattle LLC | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $175,059 |
15 | Castleberry Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $170,831 |
16 | S & L Sheep Ranch Inc | Alzada, MT 59311 | $170,546 |
17 | Tim Mcinerney | Alzada, MT 59311 | $168,174 |
18 | Alkali Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $153,663 |
19 | Willow Creek Partners Llp | Greenwich, CT 06830 | $151,420 |
20 | F & R Ranches Inc | Ekalaka, MT 59324 | $145,119 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>