Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Cascade County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 467
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $4,870,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hill Top Colony Inc | Stockett, MT 59480 | $280,045 |
| 2 | Hillcrest Colony Inc | Power, MT 59468 | $278,386 |
| 3 | Big Stone Colony Inc | Sand Coulee, MT 59472 | $251,955 |
| 4 | Fairhaven Colony Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $182,737 |
| 5 | Grass Land Colony Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $177,662 |
| 6 | Pleasant Valley Colony | Belt, MT 59412 | $176,923 |
| 7 | Bowman Ranch Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $141,925 |
| 8 | Shaw Butte Farms Inc | Sun River, MT 59483 | $124,256 |
| 9 | Area 59 | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $110,988 |
| 10 | Huber Ranch | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $96,951 |
| 11 | Bumgarner Ranch | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $85,772 |
| 12 | C & C Farms | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $84,489 |
| 13 | Sheffels Farms Inc | Great Falls, MT 59403 | $80,880 |
| 14 | Countryhome Colony Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $77,389 |
| 15 | Epic Partners | Sun River, MT 59483 | $69,771 |
| 16 | Montana Prairie Nest II | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $66,970 |
| 17 | Cascade Colony Inc | Sun River, MT 59483 | $62,538 |
| 18 | Kyle Juelfs LLC | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $60,705 |
| 19 | Dave Juelfs LLC | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $60,505 |
| 20 | Sun Land Farm Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $59,339 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
