Total Conservation Programs in Cascade County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 835
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $62,799,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Standley Brothers Partnership | Cascade, MT 59421 | $2,743,648 |
2 | Ronald & Debra Laubach | Power, MT 59468 | $1,701,505 |
3 | Holman Grain Co | Floweree, MT 59440 | $1,395,568 |
4 | Olson Orin & Lois | Cascade, MT 59421 | $1,385,674 |
5 | Neuman Land & Livestk Co Inc | Vaughn, MT 59487 | $1,063,089 |
6 | Merja Farms Inc | Sun River, MT 59483 | $1,041,844 |
7 | Epic Partners | Sun River, MT 59483 | $1,016,890 |
8 | Sweeney Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $981,347 |
9 | Dawson Ranch Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $946,973 |
10 | Olson Brothers | Great Falls, MT 59403 | $890,643 |
11 | Colleen - Colleen St Stewart Duro | Vaughn, MT 59487 | $861,064 |
12 | James C Warehime | Belt, MT 59412 | $852,603 |
13 | Dugas Farms Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $838,702 |
14 | Robert - Robert E Du E Durocher | Vaughn, MT 59487 | $832,398 |
15 | Andersen-hovland Ranch Inc | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $830,563 |
16 | Neuman Living Trust | Vaughn, MT 59487 | $774,014 |
17 | Collette M Neuman | Vaughn, MT 59487 | $773,973 |
18 | Montana Board Of Investments - Se | Saint Paul, MN 55170 | $745,313 |
19 | Christie Schlagel | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $691,740 |
20 | Arnold Schlagel | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $691,736 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>