Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Cascade County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 332
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $4,812,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hastings Ranch Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $48,902 |
22 | Rumney Cattle Company | Cascade, MT 59421 | $47,302 |
23 | Terry Iverson | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $46,650 |
24 | Lorang Land And Cattle Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $44,503 |
25 | Charles W Crabtree | Choteau, MT 59422 | $44,476 |
26 | Grass Land Colony Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $44,343 |
27 | Pleasant Valley Colony | Belt, MT 59412 | $42,445 |
28 | Hamlett Ranch Co | Cascade, MT 59421 | $42,368 |
29 | Dawson Ranch Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $41,777 |
30 | Ruth Mortag | Simms, MT 59477 | $39,793 |
31 | Carroll Oasis Inc. | Cascade, MT 59421 | $39,248 |
32 | Peggy Johnson | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $36,682 |
33 | Klick Angus Inc | Simms, MT 59477 | $36,432 |
34 | Nancy R Mortag | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $36,424 |
35 | Jeffrey S Olson | Cascade, MT 59421 | $35,439 |
36 | Pribyl Ranch Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $34,798 |
37 | Victor R Anderson | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $34,030 |
38 | Jason Cornelius | Cascade, MT 59421 | $33,480 |
39 | Rowan Ogden | Cascade, MT 59421 | $32,104 |
40 | Hill Top Colony Inc | Stockett, MT 59480 | $31,554 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”