Total Emergency Relief Program in Cascade County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 104
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $4,183,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Shaw Butte Farms Inc | Sun River, MT 59483 | $47,645 |
22 | Dave Bell Fields Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $46,911 |
23 | Shane Farm Inc | Floweree, MT 59440 | $45,617 |
24 | Carl Robert Mehmke | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $44,813 |
25 | Kyle Juelfs LLC | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $44,721 |
26 | Fredrick Fisher | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $41,217 |
27 | Sweeney Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $37,883 |
28 | Z & A Farms Inc | Power, MT 59468 | $37,685 |
29 | C & C Farms | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $37,610 |
30 | Kropp Brothers | Floweree, MT 59440 | $37,199 |
31 | Countryhome Colony Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $33,389 |
32 | Thomas L Chesbro Living Trust | Belt, MT 59412 | $31,168 |
33 | Bowman Ranch Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $28,638 |
34 | Dave Juelfs LLC | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $26,222 |
35 | Erik Somerfeld | Power, MT 59468 | $25,661 |
36 | Dawson Ranch Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $22,897 |
37 | Standley Brothers Partnership | Cascade, MT 59421 | $21,260 |
38 | Terry Iverson | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $20,117 |
39 | Andersen-hovland Ranch Inc | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $19,880 |
40 | Riley V Denning | Sun River, MT 59483 | $18,666 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”