Total Disaster Programs in Cascade County, Montana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 389
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $5,936,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Carroll Oasis Inc. | Cascade, MT 59421 | $34,438 |
42 | Diamond Lazy A Inc | Sand Coulee, MT 59472 | $34,064 |
43 | , | $33,050 | |
44 | Terry Iverson | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $32,726 |
45 | Lucas C Holzheimer | Sand Coulee, MT 59472 | $32,431 |
46 | Mckamey West Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $31,157 |
47 | Carl Robert Mehmke | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $30,874 |
48 | M & M Livestock | Belt, MT 59412 | $30,848 |
49 | Grass Land Colony Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $29,289 |
50 | Peggy Johnson | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $27,683 |
51 | Neuman Land & Livestk Co Inc | Vaughn, MT 59487 | $25,786 |
52 | Philip E Johnson | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $25,268 |
53 | Jason Cornelius | Cascade, MT 59421 | $24,945 |
54 | Mckamey Ranch Co | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $23,816 |
55 | Shaw Butte Farms Inc | Sun River, MT 59483 | $23,687 |
56 | Pribyl Ranch Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $23,363 |
57 | Glenn Weaver | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $23,255 |
58 | Hill Top Colony Inc | Stockett, MT 59480 | $22,888 |
59 | Dawson Ranch Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $22,665 |
60 | Michael E O'neill | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $22,653 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”