Total Commodity Programs in Cascade County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 752
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $9,799,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Standley Brothers Partnership | Cascade, MT 59421 | $55,441 |
42 | Dawson Ranch Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $55,014 |
43 | Wade W Jacobsen | Sun River, MT 59483 | $54,114 |
44 | Keith H Rohrer | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $52,500 |
45 | Timothy J Lords | Belt, MT 59412 | $52,429 |
46 | Sun River Farm Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $51,761 |
47 | Kyle Juelfs LLC | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $51,234 |
48 | K & R Farms Inc | Floweree, MT 59440 | $50,533 |
49 | Glacier Bank ** | Choteau, MT 59422 | $49,469 |
50 | Rj Acres Inc. | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $48,019 |
51 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $46,610 |
52 | Mccafferty Ranch Company LLC | Belt, MT 59412 | $43,174 |
53 | Ronald & Debra Laubach | Power, MT 59468 | $43,057 |
54 | Wilmer L Amstutz | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $42,122 |
55 | Terry Iverson | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $41,273 |
56 | Edward E Hastings | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $41,206 |
57 | Lane Ranch Cascade | Cascade, MT 59421 | $40,742 |
58 | Sieben Livestock Co | Helena, MT 59624 | $39,972 |
59 | Keaster Land & Livestock Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $39,364 |
60 | J & R Gettel Grains, Inc. | Power, MT 59468 | $38,619 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”