Emergency Conservation Program in Cascade County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 224
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $2,771,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | G Spencer Workman | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $7,940 |
62 | Mountain View Ranch Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $7,870 |
63 | Rocky Reef Ditch Co | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $7,168 |
64 | Eugene G Iverson Estate | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $7,157 |
65 | Pribyl Ranch Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $7,038 |
66 | Chris Herman | Belt, MT 59412 | $7,026 |
67 | Stan C Merriman | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $6,806 |
68 | Gregory C Bumgarner | Belt, MT 59412 | $6,542 |
69 | Luke H Knaup | Stockett, MT 59480 | $6,275 |
70 | Nancy Dear | Simms, MT 59477 | $6,078 |
71 | David John Fertterer | Belt, MT 59412 | $5,764 |
72 | Larry Johnson | Babb, MT 59411 | $5,451 |
73 | Richard Bogden | Cascade, MT 59421 | $5,323 |
74 | Mehmke Walter A & Robyn R | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $5,168 |
75 | Julia Gliko | Belt, MT 59412 | $5,100 |
76 | Cummings Ranch | Cascade, MT 59421 | $5,083 |
77 | Betty Jackson | Great Falls, MT 59403 | $5,069 |
78 | H C Eakman Trust | Great Falls, MT 59403 | $5,068 |
79 | Gary Anderson | Ulm, MT 59485 | $5,066 |
80 | John C Mccafferty | Belt, MT 59412 | $4,933 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”