Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Cascade County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 353
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $1,691,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Larry Johnson | Babb, MT 59411 | $5,666 |
62 | John C Hoyt Estate Dba Jolly Roge | Great Falls, MT 59403 | $5,577 |
63 | Young Family Ranch Llp | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $5,313 |
64 | Chris Herman | Belt, MT 59412 | $5,300 |
65 | Shane Farm Inc | Floweree, MT 59440 | $5,229 |
66 | Walter A Johnson | Raynesford, MT 59469 | $5,194 |
67 | Thomas E Lorang | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $5,162 |
68 | Tony Curtis Byrd | Belt, MT 59412 | $5,033 |
69 | Neil Creek Ranch Co | Belt, MT 59412 | $4,966 |
70 | Plains Grains Lmtd Prtnrshp | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $4,924 |
71 | Joan M Smiley | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $4,923 |
72 | Gerald Mayernik | Stockett, MT 59480 | $4,892 |
73 | Hugh Hastings | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $4,785 |
74 | Salo Ranch Company | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $4,782 |
75 | Louis H Mundt Dba Louis H Mundt R | Belt, MT 59412 | $4,766 |
76 | West Mott Partnership | Simms, MT 59477 | $4,650 |
77 | Gary Anderson | Ulm, MT 59485 | $4,628 |
78 | Cummings Ranch | Cascade, MT 59421 | $4,525 |
79 | Wiegand Ranch | Sun River, MT 59483 | $4,522 |
80 | Richard H Anderson Estate | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $4,496 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”