Farm Subsidy information
Cascade County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Cascade County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 788
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $14,718,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Mccafferty Ranch Company LLC | Belt, MT 59412 | $43,174 |
62 | Merja Farms Inc | Sun River, MT 59483 | $42,647 |
63 | Wilmer L Amstutz | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $42,122 |
64 | Sieben Livestock Co | Helena, MT 59624 | $39,972 |
65 | Keaster Land & Livestock Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $39,364 |
66 | J & R Gettel Grains, Inc. | Power, MT 59468 | $38,619 |
67 | Cummings Farm | Cascade, MT 59421 | $38,465 |
68 | Keith E Good | Floweree, MT 59440 | $38,248 |
69 | Riley V Denning | Sun River, MT 59483 | $38,008 |
70 | Mill Coulee Cattle | Belt, MT 59412 | $37,577 |
71 | Josephine A Eisenzimer | Cascade, MT 59421 | $37,387 |
72 | Dugas Farms Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $36,755 |
73 | Dean Carl Knaup | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $36,198 |
74 | James C Warehime | Belt, MT 59412 | $35,646 |
75 | Carson C Young | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $35,588 |
76 | Richard Terry Brandt | Power, MT 59468 | $35,050 |
77 | Valley View Ranch Inc | Stockett, MT 59480 | $35,048 |
78 | Dave Bell Fields Inc | Great Falls, MT 59406 | $34,967 |
79 | Little Belt Creek Ranch | Belt, MT 59412 | $34,838 |
80 | Dave Juelfs LLC | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $34,086 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”