Total Disaster Programs in Cascade County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 117
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $1,003,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Patrick M Halko | Sand Coulee, MT 59472 | $3,753 |
62 | Antonich Ranch LLC | Belt, MT 59412 | $3,685 |
63 | Forrest Granger | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $3,527 |
64 | Love Ranch | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $3,400 |
65 | Dolores L Bloom | Simms, MT 59477 | $3,357 |
66 | Richard D Liebert | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $3,281 |
67 | Edwin Maki | Belt, MT 59412 | $3,178 |
68 | Betty J Mader | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $3,168 |
69 | Scott Hinderager | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $3,041 |
70 | Molly S Bock | Belt, MT 59412 | $3,018 |
71 | Benjamin Bock | Belt, MT 59412 | $3,018 |
72 | Matthew E Evans | Raynesford, MT 59469 | $2,820 |
73 | Lorne Marxer | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $2,801 |
74 | Robert A Gray | Simms, MT 59477 | $2,645 |
75 | Estate Of Richard D. Umphres | Stockett, MT 59480 | $2,645 |
76 | Mountain View Ranch Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $2,504 |
77 | Stephen V Mayernik | Stockett, MT 59480 | $2,372 |
78 | Diamond Lazy A Inc | Sand Coulee, MT 59472 | $2,354 |
79 | Joseph J Konesky | Sand Coulee, MT 59472 | $2,343 |
80 | Lyle Thomas | Simms, MT 59477 | $2,004 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”