Farm Subsidy information
Cascade County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Cascade County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 788
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $14,718,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Erik Somerfeld | Power, MT 59468 | $24,080 |
102 | Dave Bell Fields Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $24,020 |
103 | Luke H Knaup | Stockett, MT 59480 | $23,869 |
104 | Shane Farm Inc | Floweree, MT 59440 | $23,650 |
105 | Ron And Yvonne Lee Family Irrv Tr | Power, MT 59468 | $23,460 |
106 | Young Family Ranch Llp | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $23,374 |
107 | Michael A Gondeiro | Belt, MT 59412 | $23,316 |
108 | Mehmke Walter A & Robyn R | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $23,167 |
109 | Holman Grain Co | Floweree, MT 59440 | $22,790 |
110 | Klick Angus Inc | Simms, MT 59477 | $22,778 |
111 | Lynn Perry - Glacier Livestock LLC | Vaughn, MT 59487 | $22,335 |
112 | Taft Ranch Company | Cascade, MT 59421 | $22,047 |
113 | Michael A Gannon | Cascade, MT 59421 | $21,780 |
114 | Remington Ranch | Monarch, MT 59463 | $21,040 |
115 | Leonard Lundby | Great Falls, MT 59403 | $20,503 |
116 | Janis Lundby | Great Falls, MT 59403 | $20,503 |
117 | Lois C Olson | Cascade, MT 59421 | $20,255 |
118 | Kate Mckamey-dba Km Land & Cattle | Ulm, MT 59485 | $19,804 |
119 | Amos J Birky | Belt, MT 59412 | $19,176 |
120 | Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust Lan | Helena, MT 59620 | $19,134 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”