Total Commodity Programs in Cascade County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 2,502
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $150,841,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Ron And Yvonne Lee Family Irrv Tr | Power, MT 59468 | $232,786 |
142 | Ronald J Lee | Power, MT 59468 | $231,971 |
143 | Duane L Urquhart | Highwood, MT 59450 | $221,303 |
144 | Little Belt Creek Ranch | Belt, MT 59412 | $220,488 |
145 | Gregory M Gould | Ulm, MT 59485 | $219,692 |
146 | William C Shirley | Stockett, MT 59480 | $218,277 |
147 | Opportunity Bank Of Montana ** | Dutton, MT 59433 | $217,606 |
148 | Cummings Ranch | Cascade, MT 59421 | $217,123 |
149 | Brett Vick | Power, MT 59468 | $214,745 |
150 | Hastings Ranch Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $214,562 |
151 | Dana Young | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $210,386 |
152 | Muddy Creek Farms LLC | Vaughn, MT 59487 | $209,611 |
153 | Debby Gunderson | Power, MT 59468 | $207,861 |
154 | Greg A Preble | Cascade, MT 59421 | $206,294 |
155 | Peggy Johnson | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $204,177 |
156 | Diamond Lazy A Inc | Sand Coulee, MT 59472 | $203,341 |
157 | Dean - Knaup Family Carl Knaup | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $201,801 |
158 | Ronald V Hepp Dba Star Dairy | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $200,482 |
159 | Edna Somerfeld | Power, MT 59468 | $200,381 |
160 | Richard J Eisenzimer | Simms, MT 59477 | $199,581 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”