Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Cascade County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 331
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $1,494,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orville & Arlene Skogen Dba Skogen Ranch | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $101,098 |
| 2 | Walter Gruel & Son Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $85,333 |
| 3 | Big Stone Colony Inc | Sand Coulee, MT 59472 | $60,105 |
| 4 | Sieben Livestock Co | Helena, MT 59624 | $39,972 |
| 5 | Lane Ranch Cascade | Cascade, MT 59421 | $32,465 |
| 6 | Mccafferty Ranch Company LLC | Belt, MT 59412 | $28,316 |
| 7 | Lane Livestock LLC | Cascade, MT 59421 | $26,738 |
| 8 | Keaster Land & Livestock Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $25,802 |
| 9 | Philip E Johnson | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $24,456 |
| 10 | Peggy Johnson | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $24,423 |
| 11 | Hastings Ranch Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $22,434 |
| 12 | Lynn Perry - Glacier Livestock LLC | Vaughn, MT 59487 | $22,335 |
| 13 | Rick Bogden | Cascade, MT 59421 | $21,749 |
| 14 | Fairhaven Colony Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $19,283 |
| 15 | John C Mccafferty | Belt, MT 59412 | $16,132 |
| 16 | Kevin Keller | Raynesford, MT 59469 | $15,081 |
| 17 | Rumney Cattle Company | Cascade, MT 59421 | $15,014 |
| 18 | Marquis Cattle Company Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $14,477 |
| 19 | Mckamey Ranch Co | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $13,757 |
| 20 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $13,177 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
