Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Cascade County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 59
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $2,368,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Evans Benson Farms Inc | Great Falls, MT 59401 | $23,704 |
22 | Roger D Croghan | Black Eagle, MT 59414 | $19,896 |
23 | John H Sheffels Jr | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $18,690 |
24 | Casebolt Trust | Seattle, WA 98125 | $18,361 |
25 | Croghan Farm LLC | Belgrade, MT 59714 | $17,400 |
26 | Jack Gunderson Farms Inc | Power, MT 59468 | $16,509 |
27 | Robert - Robert And Myers | Floweree, MT 59440 | $15,224 |
28 | Steven A Raska | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $15,177 |
29 | Lola G Raska | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $15,166 |
30 | David P Rogstad | Sun River, MT 59483 | $11,001 |
31 | Lalonnie Ward | Great Falls, MT 59406 | $10,694 |
32 | Janny Kinion- May | Marion, TX 78124 | $10,688 |
33 | William H Pearson | Fairfield, MT 59436 | $10,687 |
34 | M & K Farms Inc | Floweree, MT 59440 | $10,640 |
35 | Michael S Woodhouse | Power, MT 59468 | $10,334 |
36 | Terence D Stengrimson | Power, MT 59468 | $10,048 |
37 | Clifford C Davis | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $9,868 |
38 | Dnrc Trust Land Management - Exem | Helena, MT 59620 | $9,218 |
39 | Brenda L Croghan | Three Forks, MT 59752 | $7,995 |
40 | Shirley Cornelius | Great Falls, MT 59401 | $7,930 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”