Total Disaster Programs in Cascade County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,464
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $47,461,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Orville & Arlene Skogen Dba Skogen Ranch | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $242,565 |
42 | Somerfeld & Sons Land & Livestock | Power, MT 59468 | $240,885 |
43 | Rowan Ogden | Cascade, MT 59421 | $238,526 |
44 | Remington Ranch | Monarch, MT 59463 | $234,722 |
45 | Mckamey Ranch Co | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $233,888 |
46 | Edward E Hastings | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $231,706 |
47 | Sun Land Farm Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $227,747 |
48 | D & R Farms | Power, MT 59468 | $227,717 |
49 | Pribyl Ranch Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $219,157 |
50 | Sweeney Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $211,186 |
51 | Shane Farm Inc | Floweree, MT 59440 | $208,523 |
52 | M & M Livestock | Belt, MT 59412 | $207,726 |
53 | Lords Brothers Ranch Llp | Belt, MT 59412 | $197,854 |
54 | Windy River Farming | Sun River, MT 59483 | $197,248 |
55 | Countryhome Colony Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $196,125 |
56 | Michael A Gannon | Cascade, MT 59421 | $195,738 |
57 | Holman Grain Co | Floweree, MT 59440 | $195,560 |
58 | Terry Iverson | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $194,885 |
59 | Dana Ranch Co Inc | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $194,180 |
60 | Gettel Farms Inc | Power, MT 59468 | $192,329 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”