Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Cascade County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 332
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Cascade County, Montana totaled $4,812,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mccafferty Ranch Company LLC | Belt, MT 59412 | $227,184 |
2 | Walter Gruel & Son Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $178,736 |
3 | Lane Ranch Cascade | Cascade, MT 59421 | $137,941 |
4 | Keaster Land & Livestock Inc | Belt, MT 59412 | $125,343 |
5 | Sieben Livestock Co | Helena, MT 59624 | $125,000 |
6 | Michael A Gannon | Cascade, MT 59421 | $115,469 |
7 | Fairhaven Colony Inc | Ulm, MT 59485 | $105,718 |
8 | Michael E O'neill | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $100,414 |
9 | Orville & Arlene Skogen Dba Skogen Ranch | Fort Shaw, MT 59443 | $97,689 |
10 | Troy Eugene Johnson | Sand Coulee, MT 59472 | $93,201 |
11 | Cascade Colony Inc | Sun River, MT 59483 | $90,646 |
12 | Gollaher Ranch Co | Cascade, MT 59421 | $87,810 |
13 | Norman J Lorang | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $76,326 |
14 | John C Mccafferty | Belt, MT 59412 | $74,933 |
15 | Greg A Preble | Cascade, MT 59421 | $73,831 |
16 | Wade W Jacobsen | Sun River, MT 59483 | $61,256 |
17 | Sarah Brandt | Great Falls, MT 59404 | $60,010 |
18 | Little Belt Creek Ranch | Belt, MT 59412 | $56,150 |
19 | M & M Livestock | Belt, MT 59412 | $52,306 |
20 | Mckamey West Inc | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $50,403 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>